GUM: Trump’s Election Victory: U.S. Stocks Rise, HK and China Fall,Yet MPF Earns HKD 23,742 YTD by November

Dec 3, 2024
Reading Time: 9 minutes

Hong Kong, December 4, 2024】 – GUM today announced the performance of the MPF for November 2024. In November 2024, the “GUM MPF Composite Index” rose by 0.1% to 247.3 points; the “GUM MPF Equity Fund Index” fell by 0.3% to 334.9 points; the “GUM MPF Mixed Asset Fund Index” increased by 0.7% to 250.0 points; and the “GUM MPF Fixed Income Fund Index” rose by 0.2% to 128.8 points. In November 2024, MPF members earned an average of HKD 326 each, with a cumulative total of HKD 23,742 earned from the beginning of the year.

GUM’s Managing Director, Michael Chan, pointed out “The U.S. presidential election has concluded, with President-elect Trump’s policies of corporate tax cuts and deregulation set to benefit corporate growth, thereby driving the U.S. stock market upward. However, his use of tariffs as a negotiation tool has increased global trade barriers. The National People’s Congress proposed 6 trillion yuan in debt relief for local governments, which did not meet market expectations for fiscal stimulus, and under the shadow of a new round of trade wars, the Hong Kong and China stock markets have been volatile and declining, dragging down the overall performance of MPF equity funds. From the beginning of the year until now, the average return for MPF members has reached 9.7%. If the Central Economic Work Conference in December introduces further fiscal stimulus measures, there’s hope that the MPF returns for this year could achieve double-digit growth.”

For the asset allocation, GUM’s Strategy and Investment Analyst, Martin Wan stated, “Donald Trump and his cabinet nominees have very clear reform agendas. Members managing their MPF should carefully consider the long-term impacts of this U.S. administration on their investment portfolios, such as reducing government spending, investigating the pharmaceutical and food industries, taking a hawkish stance towards China, and tariff negotiations. If one finds it difficult to judge, more aggressive investors might consider diversifying into “Global Equity Funds” or the “DIS Core Accumulation Fund”. For those with a lower risk appetite, diversifying into “MPF Conservative Funds” or “Global Bond Funds” could be a prudent choice.”

Table 1: Overall performance of MPF and average return in November

IndexValueNovember Return (%)2024 YTD Return (%)
GUM MPF Composite Index247.30.1%9.7%
GUM MPF Equity Fund Index334.9-0.3%14.1%
GUM MPF Mixed Asset Fund Index250.00.7%8.6%
GUM MPF Fixed Income Fund Index128.80.2%2.6%
Average MPF Gain/Loss Per Member Note 1 (HKD)+326+23,742

Analysis of Equity Fund Performance

The GUM MPF Equity Fund Index saw an overall return drop of 0.3% in November. Following Trump’s election win, the U.S. stock market atmosphere was red-hot, with the best-performing equity fund categories being the “United States Equity Fund” and “Global Equity Fund” rising by 6.0% and 3.5% respectively. Conversely, the worst performers were the “Hong Kong Equity Fund,”, “Hong Kong Equity Fund (Index Tracking),” and “Greater China Equity Fund,” which fell by 4.3%, 4.3%, and 4.2% respectively, dragging down the overall performance of MPF equity funds. Since the beginning of 2024, most equity fund categories have shown double-digit growth, with the U.S. Equity Fund being the only one to exceed a 20% return so far.

Table 2: Ranking of Equity Fund Performance According to November 2024 Return

RankingEquity Sub-category Fund IndexNovember Return (%)2024 YTD Return (%)
1United States Equity Fund6.0%25.1%
2Global Equity Fund3.5%16.7%
3Japanese Equity Fund2.6%18.2%
4Other Equity Fund0.4%5.7%
5European Equity Fund-1.2%1.3%
6Asian Equity Fund-2.6%10.0%
7Greater China Equity Fund-4.2%12.5%
8Hong Kong Equity (Index Tracking)-4.3%16.2%
9Hong Kong Equity Fund-4.3%11.1%

Analysis of Mixed Assets Fund Performance

Mixed assets fund, which focus on diversified regional investments, performed steadily, with the GUM MPF Mixed Asset Fund Index seeing an overall return increase of 0.7% in November. Funds with a higher proportion of U.S. stocks like the “DIS Core Accumulation Fund” and the ” DIS Age 65 Plus Fund” were the top performers for the month, with gains of 2.6% and 1.6% respectively. On the other hand, mixed assets fund with a higher exposure to Hong Kong stocks, such as “Mixed Asset Fund- (80-100% Equity)” and ” Mixed Asset- (60-80% Equity),” fell by 0.2% and 0.1% respectively. Year-to-date, mixed asset funds that have achieved double-digit returns include the “DIS Core Accumulation Fund,”, “Target-Date Fund,” and “Mixed Asset- (80-100% Equity),” with increases of 11.6%, 11.2%, and 11.0% respectively.

Table 3: Ranking of Mixed Assets Fund Performance According to November 2024 Return

RankingMixed Assets Sub-category Fund IndexNovember Return (%)2024 YTD Return (%)
1DIS Core Accumulation Fund2.6%11.6%
2DIS Age 65 Plus Fund1.6%4.7%
3Mixed Asset- (20-40% Equity)0.3%3.1%
4Mixed Asset- (40-60% Equity)0.3%5.6%
5Other Mixed Asset Fund0.2%2.4%
6Target-Date Fund0.1%11.2%
7Dynamic Allocation Fund-0.1%6.4%
8Mixed Asset- (60-80% Equity)-0.1%8.0%
9Mixed Asset- (80-100% Equity)-0.2%11.0%

Analysis of Fixed Income Fund Performance

The GUM MPF Fixed Income Fund Index saw an overall return increase of 0.2% in November. Following Donald Trump’s election as the U.S. President, the U.S. Dollar Index rose above 107. Due to Asian bond funds predominantly investing in Asian USD bonds, they benefited from the strong US dollar, making them the best-performing category in fixed income funds for November with a 0.7% rise. Conversely, the worst performer was the “RMB Bond Fund,” which fell by 1.2% due to the weakening of the yuan. Among fixed income funds, the “Global Bond Fund” is the only one to have recorded a loss year-to-date, down by 0.5%. This is attributed to market expectations that Trump’s policies, such as imposing tariffs and deporting undocumented immigrants leading to a labor shortage, would increase inflationary pressures in the short term, prompting the Federal Reserve to reduce the number of rate cuts, thereby pressuring global bond funds.

Table 4: Ranking of Fixed Income Fund Performance According to November 2024 Return

RankingFixed Income Sub-category Fund IndexNovember Return (%)2024 YTD Return (%)
1Asian Bond Fund0.7%3.3%
2Global Bond Fund0.7%-0.5%
3Conservative Fund0.2%3.4%
4Hong Kong Dollar Bond Fund0.2%3.3%
5HKD Money Market Fund0.2%3.6%
6Guaranteed Fund0.0%2.2%
7RMB & HKD Money Market Fund-0.8%0.9%
8RMB Bond Fund-1.2%1.9%

Remarks:

  1. The average MPF return per member is calculated using total MPF assets HK$1,291,525 millions of the previous month (as of 31 October 2024). The number of MPF Scheme members was 4,754,000 as of 31 December 2023. The latest average assets per member was HK$271,671 as of 31 October 2024. The GUM MPF Composite Index return for November 2024 as of November 30, 2024.

*The growth of all fund categories indexes is calculated by asset-weighted point-to-point growth. The data for November 2024 return is summarized from 1 November to 30 November 2024.

- The End -

About GUM 

GUM is a boutique consulting firm that provides solutions to corporate on MPF and employee benefits. We focus on people and that is why we put “U” in the very core of our brand “GUM”.  Our priorities are always meeting the needs of our corporate clients and their employees, our strategic partners as well as all MPF members of Hong Kong. With our vast market experience and expert teams around actuarial, investment and employee communication, GUM leads the market to innovate, walking hand in hand with our clients to go faster and further. 

Media Enquiries, please contact: 

GUM Miss Carmen Tang/ Miss Karen Siu 

Phone: (852) 9126-9332 / (852) 6011-5603  

Email: carmentang@gumhk.com / karensiu@gumhk.com  

Website: www.gumhk.com

This document provided the information on an “AS IS” basis. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any of the information contained in this document. Some information contained in this document contains forward-looking statements. The words “believe”, “expect” and similar expressions are also intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts. Rather, these forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs, assumptions, expectations, estimates, and projections of our management. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and are difficult to predict. Consequently, actual results could differ materially from those expressed, implied or forecasted in these forward-looking statements. Reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements.